Шаблоны LeoTheme для Joomla.
GavickPro Joomla шаблоны

Banner-Aquaculture

Review Article

Aquaculture and Fish Welfare: Evidences for Fish Nociception

Carla Patrícia Bejo Wolkers*, Anette Hoffmann

Department of Physiology, School of Medicine of RibeirãoPreto, University of São Paulo, RibeirãoPreto-SP, Brazil

 *Corresponding author: Dr.Carla Patrícia Bejo Wolkers, Department of Physiology, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto-SP, Brazil, Tel: +55 16 36023332;
E-mail address: carlawolkers@yahoo.com.br

 Submitted: 08-30-2014  Accepted: 09-04-2014 Published: 09-22-2014

Download PDF

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Article


The prominent increase in the use of fish as animalmodel for behavioral, pharmacological and physiological studies, as well  as in aquaculture production chains, raisesimportant questions about the welfare of these animals and the possibility of suffering. However, the occurrence of pain in basal vertebrates such as fish is a controversial issue, even in the scientific community. While some authors suggest that the lack of specialized brain structures, such as the neocortex, prevent fish from feeling pain [1], a number of recent studies have demystified this view,pointing out that teleost fish are able to  detect and respond to noxious stimuli of different sensory modalities.These studies have shown that fish have nociceptors withsimilar characteristics to the nociceptors found in mammals,which are capable of detecting potentially painful stimuli[2,3]. In addition, several species of fish, such as piauçu (Leporinus macrocephalus) [4,5], tilapia (Oreochromisniloticus)[6] and rainbow trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss) [7,8], which are commonly used species in fish farms, haveshown behavioral and physiological changes in response to the application of noxious stimuli of different natures.These responses suggest the possibility of the perception of these stimuli as aversive and potentially painful.

The existence of a functional opioid system that modulates behavioral and physiological responses triggered by noxious stimulation has also been described in teleost fish. In addition to having all the major types of opioid receptors present in vertebrates (delta, kappa and mu) with protein structures similar to mammalian receptors [9,10, 11], the injection of exogenous opioid substances, such as morphine [3,7] and tramadol [12], inhibit the behavioral and physiological responses triggered by the application of noxious stimuli, suggesting that these drugs can promote analgesia in fish, as observed in mammals. Recent studies have demonstrated that different types of external stressors, such as social subordination [13], the exposure toconspecific alarm substances [4] and restraint [5], inhibit nociceptive responses in fish, suggesting the activation of an endogenous antinociceptive system. The antinociceptive system, which is activated by stressful situations in fish, appears to be modulated by endogenous opioid substances because pre-treatment with naloxone, a non-selective opioid antagonist, blocks the antinociception induced by the conspecific alarm substance [4] and 3min of restraint stress [5].

Although information on nociceptive processing byfish brain is still incipient, electrophysiological studies demonstrate the presence of neuronal activity, measured by evoked potentials, on telencephalon [14,15], spinal cord,cerebellum and optic tectum [14] after noxious stimulation of skin, suggesting the existence of a nociceptive pathway from the periphery to the higher central nervous system of fish.

However, despite the growing number of studies addressing this issue, the demonstration of pain in fish is adifficult task because pain is considered a complex sensory experience that involves not only the perception of an aversive stimulus but also cognitive and emotional processes [16], which is often difficult to evaluate in animal models. Regarding emotionality, some studies point to the presence of benzodiazepine receptors [17,18] and to the anxiolytic-like effects of benzodiazepine drugs [19] and of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine [20] inteleosts. Furthermore, the restraint stress-induced antinociception is inhibited by the application of benzodiazepinemidazolam in a specific telencephalic region, the dorsomedial telencephalon, suggesting that this region isrelated to the nociceptive processing in fish and can be part of its endogenous antinociceptive system [21]. Thus,although it is not yet possible to state definitively that fish are sensitive to pain, it is important that the possibility of suffering should be considered when defining managementpractices that are used in aquaculture, particularly when aprocedure can result inpotentially painful tissue damage.

References

 References

1.Rose JD. Anthropomorphism and ´mental welfare´ of fishes. Dis Aquat Organ. 2007, 75(2): 139-154.

2.Sneddon LU. Trigeminal somatosensory innervation of the head of the rainbow trout with particular reference to nociception. Brain Res. 2003, 972(1-2): 44-52.

3.Sneddon LU, Braithwaite VA, Gentle JM. Do fish have nociceptors: evidence for the evolution of a vertebrate sensory system. Proc Biol Sci. 2003, 270(1520): 1115- 1121.

4.Alves FL, Barbosa Junior A, Hoffmann A. Antinociception in piauçu fish induced by exposure to the conspecific alarm substance. Physiol Behav. 2013, 110-111: 58-62.

5.Wolkers CPB, Barbosa Junior A, Menescal-de-Oliveira L, Hoffmann A. Stress-induced antinociception in fish reversed by naloxone. Plos One. 2013, 8(7): e71175.

6.Roques JAC, Abbink W. Geurds F, van de Vis H, Flik G. Tailfin clipping, a painful procedure: studies on Nile tilapia and common carp. Physiol Behav. 2010, 101(4): 533-540.

7.Sneddon LU. The evidence for pain perception in fish: the use of morphine as an analgesic. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2003, 83(2): 153-162.

8.Reilly SC, Quinn JP, Cossins AR, Sneddon LU. Behavioural analysis of a nociceptive event in fish: Comparisons between three species demonstrate specific responses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2008, 114(1-2): 248-259.

9.Buatti MC, Pasternak GW. Multiple opiate receptors: phylogenetic differences. Brain Res. 1981, 218(1-2): 400–405.

10.Velasco EMF, Law PY, Rodriguez RE. Mu opioid receptor from the zebrafish exhibits functional characteristics as those of mammalian Mu opioid receptor. Zebrafish. 2009, 6(3): 259-268.

11.Dreborg S, RelSundstrom G, Larson TA, Dan Larhammar. Evolution of vertebrate opioid receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2008, 105(40): 15487–15492.

12.Chervova LS, Lapshin DN. Opioid modulation of pain threshold in fish. Dokl Biol Sci. 2000, 375: 590-591.

13.Ashley PJ, Ringrose S, Edwards KL, Wallington E, McCrohan CR et al. Effect of noxious stimulation upon antipredator responses and dominance status in rainbow trout. Animal Behavior. 2009, 77(2): 403–410.

14.Dunlop R, Laming P. Mechanoreceptive and nociceptive responses in the central nervous system of goldfish (Carassiusauratus) and trout (Oncorhynchusmykiss). J Pain. 2005, 6 (9): 561-568.

15.Nordgreen J, Garner JP, Janczak AM, Ranheim B, Muir WM et al. Thermonociception in fish: effects of two different doses of morphine on the thermal threshold and post-test behavior in goldfish (Carassiusauratus). Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2009, 119(1-2): 101-107.

16.Julius D, Basbaum AI. Molecular mechanisms of nociception. Nature. 2001, 413(6852): 203-210.

17.Nielsen M, Braestrup C, Squires RF. Evidence for a late evolutionary appearance of brain-specific benzodiazepine receptors: An investigation of 18 vertebrate and 5 invertebrate species. Brain Research. 1978, 141(2): 342–346.

18.Wilkinson M, Wilkinson DA, Khan I, Crim LW. Benzodiazepine receptors in fish brain: [3H]–Flunitrazepan binding and modulatory effects of GABA in rainbow trout. Brain Res Bull. 1983, 10(3): 301-303.

19.Gebauer DL, Pagnussat N, Piato AL, Schaefer IC, Bonan CD et al. Effects of anxiolytics in zebrafish: Similarities and differences between benzodiazepines, buspirone and ethanol. Pharmacol. Biochem Behav. 2011, 99(3): 480-486.

20.Barbosa Júnior A, Alves FL, Pereira ASF, Ide LM, Hoffmann A. Behavioral characterization of the alarm reaction and anciolytic-like effect of acute treatment with fluoxetine in piauçu fish. Physiol Behav. 2012, 105(3): 784-790.

21.Wolkers CPB, Hoffmann A. Midazolam microinjection in dorsomedial telencephalon blocks stress-induced antinociception in the fish Leporinusmacrocephalus. In: Neuroscience Meeting, San Diego, 2013.

 

Cite this article: Wolkers CPB. Aquaculture and Fish Welfare: Evidences for Fish Nociception. J J Aquacul Res. 2014, 1(1): 004.

Contact Us:
9600 GREAT HILLS
TRAIL # 150 W
AUSTIN, TEXAS
78759 ( TRAVIS COUNTY)
E-mail : info@jacobspublishers.com
Phone : 512-400-0398